Twitter
and most forms of social media are creating new ways of immediately spreading
information, and voicing one’s opinion.
I think with this there comes many advantages but also some disadvantages. Like the article said it can be used to
spread information faster than ever before. Twitter just provides listeners to people who have something
to say, but I think problems may arise as we get more and more information
available how can we determine what is the truth. It is much easier to make a statement using a false
identity. People now have the
ability to create a whole new virtual persona, or say exactly what they’re
thinking at any time. I think it
makes people think twice about their actions, knowing that they may eventually be posted for
everyone to see, judge, and discuss.
In the
past, the media has had the control over what issues are discussed and what is
given importance. After Twitter
and other forms of social media have been created, the internet can now be used
as a tool to spread information, discuss it and to organize events to take
action. Does Twitter monitor what
is said by their users, and how does this affect or right to freedom of speech?
I find it
interesting that there are still grey areas with Twitter and the law. Can the information someone posts of
Twitter, if it could be tracked back to the original author, could it be used
against the person in court?
Couldn’t the person argue the posts were all just for entertainment purposes? Especially since one can take up any
identity on Twitter, or change their username or real name at anytime. I think its good that Twitter works to
protect the user’s personal information, but if the government decided that it
wanted this information would Twitter have to comply?
Short answer -- to that last question -- YES it could and does demand information from Twitter. Not to mention that Twitter freely complies...
ReplyDelete